Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Connect With Us Online

Marketing for estate planners

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Revocable Living Trusts: Not Just for the Rich

  
  
  

Martha Hartney WealthCounselMartha J. Hartney, Esq.
www.hartneylaw.com
Member of WealthCounsel

“They’re too young to have a trust.”

“They don’t own enough for a trust.”

Some attorneys have even said that recommending a trust-based plan for young families is tantamount to malpractice. I’m certain that not only is it not malpractice to recommend a trust for some families, it’s potentially malpractice not to.

Many practitioners believe young families with kids don’t need trust-based planning. It’s more accurate to say they don’t believe they can afford it.

But nothing could be farther from the truth. Families with children at home and any assets at all cannot afford not to plan properly. Here’s an example:

A (Non-Fiction) Story

Seventeen years ago, my cousin, a young mother, became an instant widow. Her husband along with her brother, both pilots, died in a plane crash in the mid-South.

If that weren’t tragic enough, my cousin has been sub­jected to ongoing court proceedings over the assets her son inherited. She’s had to appear in court each year to account for every penny of the assets she herself should be managing, and she had to pay a financial guardian and bond fees.

My cousin has raised her son alone, while dealing with ongoing legal proceedings. And when her son reached sixteen and a half, they got into an argument typical of that age and he left. He moved out because he knew he’d be getting his inheritance.

She has no control over how her son uses that money, if he’ll do something productive with it or fall into traps kids encounter—peer pressure, thinking they know it all, believing that the first hit of meth won’t hurt them.

She said, “If you can prevent that for even one family, you will have done a great service.”

The Scary Reality

Kids instinctively separate from parents in the early teen trust based plan for young familiesyears. The main leverage we have to continue to encour­age kids is financial. Ordinarily, kids are willing to stay close to the nest until they’ve acquired the skills they need to go out and make their own way. Whenever the financial balance is upset, kids may be harmed by the assets they acquire. I don’t need to list the umpteen teenage stars or heirs that have let money get the better of them.

Preventing kids from receiving assets at 18, creating certainty in who will raise our kids, and responsibly providing for them and our guardians are worthy goals for families that trust-based planning, and kids’ protection planning, are perfectly suited to achieve. Avoiding the financial burden and emotional gauntlet of a conservator­ship is a more compelling reason to plan than avoiding estate taxes or passing on wealth to our heirs. Those goals take on more importance as we age.

An Ounce of Prevention

Because of the statistical reality that some parents do die and become incapacitated—three times in my own large family—kids of parents who do not plan are at risk both of becoming involved in lengthy court proceedings or worse, getting lost, temporarily or permanently, in the foster care system.

We have the opportunity to prevent that—by helping parents understand the stakes in plain English, sharing stories like my cousin’s and making planning financially accessible.

Financial Accessibility

We can make our services accessible by offering an automatic payment program (ACH debit) and let them pay over time interest free. Local banks that want your business will allow small-batch debits. Offering ACH debits, we can help families make that investment, earn their trust, and create clients for life. After all, they are going to be the older and wealthy families of the future. Often, they’ll decide not to use an ACH payment but the mere fact that they could use it helps them make the leap of faith.

When parents understand trust-based planning, they ask why their friends don’t have them, but their parents do. I tell them, as a profession, we don’t make a concerted effort to educate families. If we did, far more would have trusts in place for the long term.

Parents know they need to “do something.” But they don’t know what or where to turn. They don’t want to hire a large law firm for fear of getting billed in six-minute in­crements or getting lost in the shuffle. They want someone they can turn to, someone who means something to them, who’s earned their trust, who will be there to guide their family through tragedy and back into life.

About the Author:

Martha’s practice serves families with children and non-tradi­tional families because she is committed to helping moms and dads bring their greatest gifts into parenting fearlessly and with joy. She knows legal planning for parents is part of the parent­ing journey and a primary responsibility to ensure that the children entrusted to us are cared for the way we want them to be should the unthinkable happen.

Martha graduated from the University of Denver while being a full time mother of two sons. She focused her studies on family, juvenile, and estate law and served in the Boulder County Dis­trict Attorney’s Office; Larimer County Domestic Courts; and the Rocky Mountain Children’s Law Center. Martha has served as a pro bono guardian ad litem representing abused and delin­quent children. After law school, she was certified as a Child & Family Investigator through the Colorado Bar Association. She has also supported new mothers as a La Leche League Leader and been an advocate of attachment parenting and natural parenting. You can reach Martha at martha@hartneylaw.com or visit her website at www.hartneylaw.com.

Editor's Note:

revocable-living-trust-sample

Comments

Martha, I agree 100%. A RLT is for control of ones life, the life of dependent, loved ones. 
 
I have a 21 year old widow of a soldier kille in the war. She has a 3 year old son. I urged her to get a half million term policy on her self. foe a 20 year level term it cost her $265 per year. 
 
She has little other property, but the Trust is in place to provide for this boy until he is grown, in case she cannot. They don't have to be a widow to have the dependents that need protected. Just think about all the IF's out there, they all call for RLT.
Posted @ Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:02 PM by James W. Respess
Thank you, James.  
 
A colleague recently said he didn't understand the benefits of a RLT when probate is so easy and a conservatorship can be avoided with a power of attorney. Some attorneys don't truly appreciate the value of avoiding ALL court proceedings and have a hard time conveying the value to their clients of having a governing plan in place in case of death or incapacity.  
 
Only a RLT operates in incapacity or death and provides the guidance and protections that families need. A POA is insufficient because it's a blank check and doesn't avoid a conservatorship if someone is incapacitated for any length of time. Who wants to be in court? Not me. I want my clients to decide how their families continue on without them, not a court.  
 
A RLT is simply the best of all possible solutions for many people. 
 
Yours, 
Martha 
 
Posted @ Sunday, August 07, 2011 7:26 PM by Martha
I am a single mother of a 16 year old minor child. I'm also a probate and estate planning attorney. I firmly believe that RLTs are not utilized enough by estate planners serving young families. Trusts are not only for the rich and tax planning. If done properly, and depending on your state law, they are asset protection tools and can be used to preserve whatever wealth families have, by allow for periodic distribution.  
 
I see a lot of parents naming their children or familiy members as beneficiaries for life insurance policies and this can only lead to disasters. A RLT is an essential estate planning tool for young families.  
 
 
 
Sophia
Posted @ Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:35 AM by Sophia
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

 

Posts on the WealthCounsel Estate Planning Blog reflect the opinions and conclusions of the original author and do not necessarily reflect any official position of WealthCounsel, LLC

Content Reuse

All blog posts on The Estate Planning Blog™ are copyrighted by WealthCounsel, LLC.  You are free to share, distribute or transmit any work on this blog site under the following conditions:

  • Attribution: You must attribute the content that you have used by prominently displaying a credit link back to the specific article page and mentioning the author by name. The credit link used should point to the article page and not just to the blog’s main page.  
  • Noncommercial Usage. You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless given pre-authorization. Content on The Estate Planning Blog™ cannot be packaged and sold to anyone nor can it be used in its entirety as a free gift or bonus for a commercial product.

 

Posts on the WealthCounsel Estate Planning Blog reflect the opinions and conclusions of the original author and do not necessarily reflect any official position of WealthCounsel, LLC